In 1826 the world's first photograph was taken.
You can see that photograph at this link.
Here we have some tree owners who either have no idea when photography was invented or don't care. These are from two different trees.
Uploaded to: Eliakim Wardwell (1634-1692)
Attached to: Same person on 5 more trees
You can see that photograph at this link.
Here we have some tree owners who either have no idea when photography was invented or don't care. These are from two different trees.
Uploaded to: Eliakim Wardwell (1634-1692)
Attached to: Same person on 5 more trees
Thanks to Margaret for the link to this photo.
Uploaded to: Elizabeth Smith (1665-1766)
Attached to: Same person on 3 more trees
Attached to: Same person on 3 more trees
Thanks to Kristin for the link to this photo.
If you have a photo to suggest please send a link to buwtree(at)gmail(dot)com.
PREVIOUS POST: Mother or Father?
NEXT POST: Civil War Zombie Corps 3
If you have a photo to suggest please send a link to buwtree(at)gmail(dot)com.
PREVIOUS POST: Mother or Father?
NEXT POST: Civil War Zombie Corps 3
You said it, "they don't care". They just like to add stuff - sort of like hoarding...
ReplyDeleteThat's exactly what it's like! Every coat of arms icon, every clip art flag,... UGH!
DeleteI hope that people are tagging these with notes on the trees.
ReplyDeleteIf you scroll down on this post
Deletehttp://buwt.blogspot.com/2012/11/why-photo-edition.html
you'll see a reaction from someone who has gotten comments on their inaccurate photo. It's not pretty :-P
Maybe they were time travelers?
ReplyDeleteThat has crossed my mind ;-)
Deletehttp://buwt.blogspot.com/2012/10/that-explains-everything.html
that's so funny. I wasn't aware that happened with photos - I've seen lots of parents on family trees that were younger than their offspring but a photo dating to the 1600's? that's just comical.
ReplyDeleteIf you take a look at some of the other photo posts here you'll see it's not limited to actual photos. Images of paintings incorrectly attributed, photos of dolls attached to Plantagenets,...Is it any wonder that I need a drink to write about some of these ;-)
DeleteI wonder whether these may have been added to indicate that these folk were descendants of the person to whom they were attached? (Just trying to find a rational explanation when there probably isn't one).
ReplyDeleteIt would be ancestors of the person in the photo but no, I don't think being rational ever comes into the equation :-P
DeleteThanks.... just another cautionary tale about the "stuff" posted on family trees. Can't be too careful.
ReplyDelete"Do not mindlessly click" applies to every part of the tree ;-)
DeleteMy eighth great granfather...yay!!
ReplyDeleteToo bad it wasn't really him 😂
Delete