Comments after the jump.
FAMILIES OF JOHANNES JOHN PICKARD (1760-1827)
ANNA ROSINA COUNTRYMAN (1740-1786)
Nicholas Pickard, b. 1752
Anna Pickard, b. 1754
Maria Margaret Pickard, b. 1756
John Pickard, b. 1766
MAGDALENA MARGARET GARLOCK (1767-1851)
Nicholas Pickard, b. 1752
Anna Pickard, b. 1754
Maria Margaret Pickard, b. 1756
John Pickard, b. 1766
Maria Madgelena Pickard, b. 1784
Charity Gertrude Pickard, b. 1785
Adam Pickard, b. 1786
Catherine Pickard, b. 1789
Charity Gertrude Pickard, b. 1789
Peter Pickard, b. 1791
James Pickard, b. 1793
Bartholomew Pickard, b. 1797
Nancy Pickard, b. 1798
Nicholas Pickard, b. 1799
Sylvanus Pickard, b. 1800
Abraham J. Pickard, b. 1801
Henry Pickard, b. 1803
Albert Pickard, b. 1807
Porter Pickard, b. 1832
ⓑⓐⓡⓚⓘⓝⓖ ⓤⓟ ⓣⓗⓔ ⓦⓡⓞⓝⓖ ⓣⓡⓔⓔ
A 20 year age difference is not that unusual IF both people have actually been born at the time of the marriage. Of course having children born to the marriage is much more likely if the husband is the one who is 20 years older. It also helps if a man has himself been born before he starts fathering children. And the mother? Yeah, it's a good idea if she's born before her kids are. It's also much easier on the mother if she's not giving birth at 65 years old after being a widow for 5 years. I'll spare you the necrophilia jokes and my ruminations on how she got pregnant with her husband's child 5 years after his death.
Do I need to say it? There are no sources attached except other trees. Of course they all have impeccable research so you should copy them. (Someone please create a sarcasm font!) According to some of those other trees Anna Rosina is the mother of John Pickard, others have her married to a different John Pickard/Pickart/Pickert, still others have her married to a different John and have them as parents of the above John.
Out of the first 200 trees to show up in search results for Anna Rosina Countryman one, ONE, has a record attached. (Another looks like it has a record attached but the record is One World Tree so that doesn't really count :-P) That one tree has one record, an SAR membership application. So maybe the person with that one record actually tried...
JOHN PICKARD (????-1783)
&
ANNA ROSINA BARBARA COUNTRYMAN (1743-1786)
&
ANNA ROSINA BARBARA COUNTRYMAN (1743-1786)
Married in 1750
CHILDREN
Conrad Pickard, b. 1727
Nicholas Pickard, b. 1752
Anna Pickard, b. 1754
Maria Margretha Pickard, b. 1756
Jacob Pickard, b. 1758
Johannas Pickard, b. 1760
Henry Pickard, b. 1760
Isaac Pickard, b. 1762
George Pickard, b. 1765
John Pickard, b. 1766
Hartman Pickard, b. 1770
Jacob Pickard, b. 1772
Conrad Pickard, b. 1774
Maria Elizabeth Pickard, b. 1775
Catherine Pickard, b. 1789
Peter Pickard, b. 1790
Adam Pickard, b. 1791
James Pickard, b. 1794
John Pickard, b. 1796
Nancy Pickard, b. 1797
Bartholomew Pickard, b. 1797
Sylvanus Pickard, b. 1800
Jacobus Pickard, b. 1801
Henry Pickard, b. 1803
Albert Pickard, b. 1807
Abraham John Pickard, b. 1810
Maria Elizabeth Pickard, b. 1775
Catherine Pickard, b. 1789
Peter Pickard, b. 1790
Adam Pickard, b. 1791
James Pickard, b. 1794
John Pickard, b. 1796
Nancy Pickard, b. 1797
Bartholomew Pickard, b. 1797
Sylvanus Pickard, b. 1800
Jacobus Pickard, b. 1801
Henry Pickard, b. 1803
Albert Pickard, b. 1807
Abraham John Pickard, b. 1810
Or maybe that was wishful thinking on my part. Sigh.
So according to this second profile Anna Rosina's timeline looks something like this:
AGE EVENT
-16 gave birth to first child
0 was born herself
7 got married
9 gave birth to second child
11 gave birth to third child
13 gave birth to fourth child
15 to 43 gave birth to 10 more children
43 died
46 to 67 continued to have children, TWELVE children
Four children by age 13, nowadays that would mean you get a reality show or you'd be locked up in the Mayo Clinic and studied. Seriously though, how do this many mistakes go unnoticed?!!?
Hat tip to Genette for the heads up about the first profile ;-)
PREVIOUS POST: A Stranger's Impact
NEXT POST: R U Calling My Nana a Liar?
This is my new favorite blog. I'm sure I have some dumb mistakes on my tree (I've found a few where I mistyped dates, etc.) but some of these just take the cake! Thanks for the laughs.
ReplyDeleteThanks KT!
DeleteWell, my great, great, great grandmother was even more impressive. She gave birth 96 years after her death. Or one of my distant relatives has that in her tree. Normally, we ignore those trees. In the case of my one family line, the person who has this teeny, tiny error (yes sarcasm fonts would be fabulous) claims to be the all knowing expert on that line, too. Mislabeled pictures even when people who knew the people said, no, this is not ancestor B it's ancestor A. And so the wrong information is spread into even more trees. Sigh.
ReplyDeleteYup. It used to make me want to throw things. I feel much better now that I vent a little and laugh at them ;-) I do wish there was a way to do something about it though. Maybe a voting system. If a tree gets a certain number of negative votes it gets pushed WAY down in search results and doesn't pop up in hints. Sigh, is right.
Delete